<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Backwards Reflection Optical Illusion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://visualfunhouse.com/reflection-optical-illusions/backwards-reflection-optical-illusion.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://visualfunhouse.com/reflection-optical-illusions/backwards-reflection-optical-illusion.html</link>
	<description>Optical Illusion Fun House</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 00:20:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ScudMonkey</title>
		<link>http://visualfunhouse.com/reflection-optical-illusions/backwards-reflection-optical-illusion.html/comment-page-1#comment-5538</link>
		<dc:creator>ScudMonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 20:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://visualfunhouse.com/reflection-optical-illusions/backwards-reflection-optical-illusion.html#comment-5538</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know who submitted this but I can assure you it was done in Photoshop because it&#039;s my shot - the original is on Flickr at 

http://www.flickr.com/photos/pcbradley/200276486/

As Acme points out the blur is wrong....

Nice to see it generated some interest!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know who submitted this but I can assure you it was done in Photoshop because it&#8217;s my shot &#8211; the original is on Flickr at </p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/pcbradley/200276486/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/pcbradley/200276486/</a></p>
<p>As Acme points out the blur is wrong&#8230;.</p>
<p>Nice to see it generated some interest!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MNassau</title>
		<link>http://visualfunhouse.com/reflection-optical-illusions/backwards-reflection-optical-illusion.html/comment-page-1#comment-5294</link>
		<dc:creator>MNassau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 03:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://visualfunhouse.com/reflection-optical-illusions/backwards-reflection-optical-illusion.html#comment-5294</guid>
		<description>hole in the wall, two guys (twins?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hole in the wall, two guys (twins?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Acme</title>
		<link>http://visualfunhouse.com/reflection-optical-illusions/backwards-reflection-optical-illusion.html/comment-page-1#comment-1813</link>
		<dc:creator>Acme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 19:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://visualfunhouse.com/reflection-optical-illusions/backwards-reflection-optical-illusion.html#comment-1813</guid>
		<description>This definitely Photoshop.
1. The angle of the reflection is absolutely the same of the reflection.
2. Homogenized blur. What kind of camera focus near and far, but blurs the middle of the range?

Sorry but someone is trying to make a fool of us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This definitely Photoshop.<br />
1. The angle of the reflection is absolutely the same of the reflection.<br />
2. Homogenized blur. What kind of camera focus near and far, but blurs the middle of the range?</p>
<p>Sorry but someone is trying to make a fool of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: supermanjango</title>
		<link>http://visualfunhouse.com/reflection-optical-illusions/backwards-reflection-optical-illusion.html/comment-page-1#comment-1591</link>
		<dc:creator>supermanjango</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 03:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://visualfunhouse.com/reflection-optical-illusions/backwards-reflection-optical-illusion.html#comment-1591</guid>
		<description>the theory the top is wrong because in the reflection the guy is facing a door, not the mirror, so my theory is that the guy is actually looking at an enlarged  photograph of the back of his head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the theory the top is wrong because in the reflection the guy is facing a door, not the mirror, so my theory is that the guy is actually looking at an enlarged  photograph of the back of his head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
